 |
It turns out that givers are the least vulnerable to the mistake of overinvesting in people…
|
112 |
 |
…because of their dedication to others, givers are willing to work harder and longer than takers and matchers. Even when the practice is no longer enjoyable…
|
119 |
 |
Whereas takers often strive to be the smartest people in the room, givers are more receptive to expertise from others, even if it challenges their own beliefs.
|
121 |
 |
…powerless communication… works for givers because they establish a sincere intent to act in the best interests of others.
|
153 |
 |
Success involves more than just capitalizing on the strengths of giving; it also…
|
155 |
 |
Successful givers, it turns out, are just as ambitious as takers and matchers.
|
157 |
 |
Selfless giving is a form of pathological altruism… such that in the process of trying to help others… givers end up harming themselves.
|
157 |
 |
Selfless giving, in the absence of self-preservation instincts, easily becomes overwhelming.
|
158 |
 |
…when concern for others is couples with a healthy dose of concern for the self, givers are less prone to burning out and getting burned…
|
158 |
 |
Along with reducing burnout among givers, a firsthand connection to impact can tilt people of all reciprocity styles in the giver direction.
|
168 |