 |
…reluctance to be assertive is especially likely to afflict agreeable givers, who pay a price in their pocketbooks.
|
203 |
 |
…in short-term, single-issue negotiations givers do worse than takers, because they’re willing to give larger slices of the pie to their counterparts.
|
206 |
 |
Givers, particularly agreeable ones, often overestimate the degree to which assertiveness might be off-putting to others.
|
208 |
 |
By looking for opportunities to benefit others and themselves, otherish givers are able to think in more complex ways and identify win-win solutions…
|
213 |
 |
Instead of assuming they’re doomed to become doormats, successful givers recognize that their everyday choices shape the results they achieve in competitive, confrontational situations.
|
215 |
 |
…when they feel inclined to back down, successful givers are prepared to draw reserves of assertiveness from their commitments to the people who matter to them.
|
215 |
 |
If a group develops a norm of giving, members will uphold the norm and give, even if they’re more inclined to be takers or matchers elsewhere.
|
220 |
 |
Common ground is a major influence on giving behaviors.
|
225 |
 |
People are motivated to give to others when they identify as part a common community.
|
228 |
 |
“Legitimizing small contributions draws in takers, making it difficult and embarrassing for them to say no, without dramatically reducing the amount donated by givers.”
|
235 |